banner Image

Pitfalls of Not Conducting a Likelihood of Confusion Survey

Consumer surveys can be a powerful toolto prove or disprove likelihood of confusion inTTAB casesA failure to conduct one may ultimately result in the Boardeven with little to no evidence,...

read more →

Likelihood of Confusion, Trademark

Proving Irreparable Harm with Consumer Surveys

In a recent case, Puma sought a preliminary injunction against Forever 21, after the popular fashion retailer began producing an alleged knock-off of Puma’s Fenty Creeper sneaker, as well as the Fur...

read more →

Frequently Asked Questions about Trademark Surveys

AMS Survey Experts and researchers, answer a few questions from a recent webinar, Surveys in Trademark Litigation.

read more →

Trademark

Join Us in Boston for the INTA 2019 Annual Meeting

Come meet our litigation team during the 141st INTA Annual Meeting, hosted in our hometown of Boston, MA! Last year’s meeting was the largest to date, with over 9500 attendees from 140 countries.

read more →

News, Conference

What Makes a Survey for Litigation Successful?

Surveys have become a routine form of evidence for courts in cases involving trademarks and deceptive advertising. Although it may appear simple to design a survey (don’t you simply write some...

read more →

Trademark

The Importance of Consumer Surveys in Establishing Secondary Meaning

A trademark has acquired secondary meaning when it becomes recognized as a specific good or service originating from a single source. Trademarks that are considered to be merely descriptive of the...

read more →

Trademark, Secondary Meaning

Surveys Used to Determine Secondary Meaning

If a proposed trademark or service mark is not inherently distinctive, it may be registered on the Principal Register only upon proof of acquired distinctiveness, or "secondary meaning." In order to...

read more →

Trademark, Secondary Meaning

Letter From the President

Dear Friends,

2019 is a notable year for AMS, as we will mark the 30thanniversary of our founding. As we celebrate this milestone, it is worth reflecting on all that we have achievedand our hopes...

read more →

News

The Value of Proposing Conjoint Analysis in Support of Damages Models for Class Certification

A recent decision by a California court sheds light on the value of proposing conjoint analysis to support a damages model in class certification.

read more →

Class Action/Class Certification, Conjoint Analysis

AMS Provides Persuasive Rebuttal in Backyard BBQ Infringement Matter

In a recent case in the Eastern District of North Carolina (Variety Stores, Inc. v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.,Civil Action No. 5:14-cv-00217), the jury found Wal-Mart guilty of willful infringement of...

read more →

Likelihood of Confusion, Trademark

Page 6 of 12 4 5 6 7 8

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR BLOG