To secure a preliminary injunction in a trademark infringement action, the plaintiff must show both a likelihood of success on the merits and proof of irreparable harm. Although it used to be that...
A continuation of our Meet the Experts Series, Steve Gaskin answers questions regarding his experience and expertise in conjoint analysis.
On August 9, 2017, the Honorable John A. Kronstadt, United States District Judge in the United States District Court, Central District Of California, released a ruling on Defendants’ Motion To...
In Select Comfort Corporation v. Dires LLC (0:12-cv-02899-DWF-SER), the plaintiffs claimed that Dires used various Select Comfort trademarks including “Sleep Number” as part of a Google AdWords...
As a follow-up to Part 1 of our claims webinar, “Make a Statement: Why Claim Substantiation Matters,” Applied Marketing Science's team of survey researchers summarizes some of the factors you may...
As a follow-up to Part 1 of our claims webinar, “Make a Statement (PART 1): Why claim substantiation matters”, Applied Marketing Science's team of survey researchers provide some pre-planning tips...
One of the most widely used and accepted methods for establishing trademark infringement is to conduct a likelihood of confusion survey among the relevant consumer population. Survey evidence in...
In the recent TTAB decision (Omaha Steaks International, Inc. v. Greater Omaha Packing Co., Inc., Consolidated Opposition No. 91213527 and Cancellations Nos. 92059629 and 92059455), Applied Marketing...
Applied Marketing Science, Inc. (AMS), a leading-edge market research and consulting firm, is pleased to announce that Dr. Harry Lawless has affiliated with the firm’s Litigation Support practice.